Much of spiritual growth depends on our willingness to examine not only what we believe, but how we think. That is where metacognition becomes essential, especially for those who teach, study Scripture deeply, or lead others in faith.

What Metacognition Means

Ken Coley defines metacognition as being “mindful of one’s thinking processes, such as strategies to puzzle out the meaning of an unfamiliar word or improve recall of specific facts.”¹ In simple terms, metacognition is thinking about how you think.

For someone who is naturally analytical, this kind of reflection often happens instinctively. Over time, I have learned to notice patterns in my thinking, recognize biases, and ask why I interpret information the way I do. Rather than hindering my faith, this awareness has become a meaningful tool in my relationship with God.

When reading Scripture, I often find myself forming an immediate interpretation of a verse. Instead of accepting that reaction at face value, I have learned to pause and ask why I read the text that way. That question has led me into deeper study, greater humility, and more honest engagement with the biblical text. Metacognition allows space for God to challenge assumptions and reshape understanding.

Why Teaching in Isolation Has Limits

Sermon and teaching preparation is often treated as a solitary task. While there is value in personal study, prayer, and reflection, preparing in isolation can unintentionally create blind spots.

Ken Davis highlights the importance of teamwork when he explains that his team can enter any venue and immediately identify what will help or hinder the way the message reaches the audience.² That kind of awareness is not accidental. It requires trust, communication, and shared understanding between the speaker and the team.

A team can help identify gaps in logic, unclear phrasing, or unexamined assumptions. When teachers immerse themselves deeply in their own work, they can overlook how their message confuses, overwhelms, or unintentionally misleads others.Outside perspectives can surface what the teacher is too close to notice.

Davis also emphasizes that the strongest messages are those that can be heard, felt, and lived.³ Allowing others to engage with a teaching before it is delivered helps ensure that it connects not only intellectually, but practically and spiritually.

The Risks of Too Many Voices

While collaboration is valuable, it is not without risk. When too many opinions are given equal weight, the message can lose clarity and conviction. Scripture can be interpreted differently, and not all resistance comes from thoughtful discernment. Sometimes people resist messages that bring conviction or discomfort.

If a teacher attempts to satisfy every perspective, the result may be a message that is watered down or, worse, misaligned with the truth of the text. Discernment is required when receiving feedback, especially in matters of doctrine and application.

Ultimately, God must have the final word.

One of the most formative reminders I have received came from a close friend after I offered feedback on something she was preparing to teach. She shared that she felt a strong conviction that what I suggested was not what God was calling her to say. That moment was a clear reminder that even well intentioned advice must submit to the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Why This Matters

Metacognition helps us recognize our biases. Community helps us refine our message. But neither replaces dependence on God.

Effective teaching requires awareness of how we think, humility to invite feedback, and discernment to listen first to the voice of God. When those elements work together, teaching becomes not just informative, but transformative.

---

Footnotes

1. Ken Coley, Teaching for Change: Eight Keys for Transformational Bible Study with Teens (Randall House, 2017), 50.
2. Ken Davis, Secrets of Dynamic Communications: Prepare with Focus, Deliver with Clarity, Speak with Power (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2013), 115.
3. Ibid., 144.